What We Do

  • We recently got a ten-year ban overturned by the Entry Clearance Manager for one of our client whose first application was refused under 320(7A) and the second one under 320(7B).
  • We won an appeal of a Zambian national who had successfully made a number of late extensions to her student applications.  After she had been in the UK for 10 years she submitted an application under the long residence rule for indefinite leave to remain. The application was turned down as she had not lawfully completed 10 years in the UK and had not been in the UK for the 14 years either.  Her two children had been granted indefinite  leave to remain, the youngest being 15 years old.  We successfully argued that the Home Office should have applied the then  7 year policy for this client and her children  as this was in place when the client’s children qualified under this policy.
  • We have successfully argued in various cases where the Home Office have not considered Rule 395C factors in a refusal, that such a decision is not in accordance with the law and that the appeal should be allowed on that technical basis even where the appeal would not have succeeded on the main grounds.
  •  We have represented overstayers to regularise their stay in the UK as Tier 1 (post-Study) Work Migrants, and Tier 4 (Students).
  • We have represented overstayers to regularise their stay where they have spouses or children who have settled status in the UK.
  • We have represented overstayers to regularise their stay under the legacy scheme for people who claimed asylum before 5th March 2007 and have exhausted their appeal rights.
  • We have represented overstayers to regularise their stay under the Human Rights Act 1998. 
  • We have successfully represented in the Tribunal many complex EEA cases.